I’m going to out myself as a Daily Mail website reader here by linking to this article in which they worry about the trend for ‘sick-lit’ aimed at young people. Thirteen Reasons Why, according to the DM, breaks the taboo about teen suicide. I do find it fascinating that it took until 2013 for the writer of this article to actually become aware of this book that was published in 2007, but let’s set that heel-dragging aside and focus upon the book itself, and whether it deserves to be labelled ‘sick-lit’.
I read a lot of teen fiction, mainly fantasy driven novels,
partially because they are about all I concentrate on during term time: witness
how long The Stand took me to read. I
also actually enjoy them for what they are, maybe because in my head I’m still fifteen
and quite melodramatic. I’ve read all The Hunger Games, the Chaos Walking
trilogy and any Sarah Dessen I can get my hands on. Thirteen Reasons Why has been on my list of ‘want-to-reads’ for a
while and just so happened to be written by somebody whose surname began with
an ‘A’ and so came to hand when I started my newest trawl of the library
shelves. It took me about four hours to read so from a progress point of view,
it was clearly something which kept me hooked.
So, to the story: Hannah Baker kills herself. Weeks later,
Clay receives a package of audio tapes on which she has recorded a message for
thirteen people: the thirteen people she perceives to have been instrumental in
her decision to take her own life. Clay is one of them and must listen to them
before passing them on to the next person, or the whole school will hear all of
the tapes. As a premise, it’s pretty adventurous; Asher sets up a dual
narrative which interweaves in a way I’ve never seen before. The very fact that
you already know Hannah is dead and therefore nothing Clay does will stop that
should make the book less compelling, but somehow it didn’t. I still really
wanted to know what Clay had done to force her down that path.
Of course, the very nature of these thirteen reasons raise
issues over whether it is fair to blame anybody for someone’s suicide. My
opinion is, no, never, but then Hannah is a teenager. Teenagers habitually
blame others for their mistakes, and whilst no-one on Hannah’s tapes seems to
have done anything too awful (apart from her 12th reason), it’s a
lesson for everybody in how what we do affects everybody else: the Butterfly
Effect in some ways; It’s a Wonderful Life in others. Certainly, her thirteenth
reason made me think about what I’d do in that situation, and it was a little
uncomfortable.
The Daily Mail article suggests that books like these might
lead teenagers to be depressed or even to attempt similar acts of violence
themselves. I sincerely doubt that. Romeo
and Juliet has never been proven to have a direct impact upon people’s
actions after all. What’s more, Thirteen
Reasons Why does not glorify suicide – Clay himself as narrator repeatedly
asserts his anger with Hannah for what she’s done and how she’s trying to
implicate others in it. But this book just might make people think twice about
what they do, which can only ever be a good thing for young people.
Perhaps the most disappointing thing about this book is that the film is supposedly in production to be released this year - with Selena Gomez in the role. Sheesh.
Perhaps the most disappointing thing about this book is that the film is supposedly in production to be released this year - with Selena Gomez in the role. Sheesh.
No comments:
Post a Comment